legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ryles
Defendant Amos Terrill Ryles appeals from judgment entered following a jury conviction for making criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422;[1] count 1). The jury also found true allegations that defendant had been convicted of a serious or violent felony (§§ 1170.12, subd. (a)(1), and 667, subds. (c) & (e)(1)), and served two prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (a)). The jury found defendant not guilty of trying to prevent an executive officer from performing her duty (§ 69; count 2). The trial court sentenced defendant to 11 years in prison.
Defendant contends the introduction into evidence of an inordinate amount of prejudicial evidence of defendant’s uncharged misconduct violated his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale