In re P.S.
Mother Donna S. (mother) appeals from the dependency court’s order that she be given monitored visitation with her three children, contending that she should have been allowed unmonitored visits instead. Based on her recent brushes with the law involving prostitution and drunken driving, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Father Devin S. (father) has also appealed from that order, but his appointed counsel filed a brief under In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835 (Phoenix H.) that raised no issues. We affirm as to him as well.
Comments on In re P.S.