In re Dayton J.
Dustin H. appeals juvenile court orders declaring William C. to be Dayton J.'s presumed father, ordering Dayton placed with William and terminating jurisdiction. Dustin contends the court erred by denying his request for paternity testing and the court misinterpreted the legal effect of a stipulation he executed with Dayton's mother, Amanda J., regarding paternity. He also argues he is Dayton's presumed father under Family Code section 7611, subdivision (c)[1] and the court incorrectly weighed the presumptions of section 7611, subdivision (d) to determine that William, rather than he, is Dayton's presumed father. We affirm the orders.
Comments on In re Dayton J.