legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Boone v. Simpson
Kerry Lee Simpson appeals from a domestic violence prevention restraining order issued against him for the protection of his former girlfriend, Stephanie J. Boone, and her two children. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for a continuance of the hearing on Boone's request for a restraining order because he was entitled to an automatic continuance under Family Code[1] section 243, subdivision (d). He also contends that the court abused its discretion in issuing the restraining order. We agree that Simpson was entitled to an automatic continuance under section 243 and, accordingly, remand the matter for a new hearing on Boone's request for a restraining order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale