In re L.O.
M.P. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders finding his minor son, M.P., a dependent child of the juvenile court. Father contends that there was not substantial evidence to support the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b), (d), and (j)[1] that M.P. was at risk because of father’s sexual abuse of S.P., M.P.’s older sister. We hold that father’s appeal is nonjusticiable, and in any event, we reject father’s contention. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on In re L.O.