legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.C.
In two dependency appeals, consolidated for purposes of oral argument and decision, M.H., the father of A.C., challenges the orders made by the juvenile court denying father’s three requests to represent himself and father’s additional request for gas vouchers so that he could conduct visitation in Landers in San Bernardino County rather than Cabazon in Riverside County.
A.C. was returned to the custody of father and mother in October 2012 and the dependency case was dismissed by the juvenile court in January 2013. (E057405; Evid. Code, § 459.) After reviewing the record, we have determined that the issues raised by father no longer present a justiciable controversy. Therefore, the appeals are DISMISSED as moot.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale