In re A.C.
Michael C. appeals an order declaring his minor daughter A.C. a dependent of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (c), and removing her from his custody.[1] Michael contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the court's order because there were disposition alternatives available that were less drastic than removal. Michael also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the court's finding that active efforts were made to prevent the removal of A.C. from Michael's custody, as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. section 1901 et seq. (ICWA). We affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re A.C.