legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ocampo
Appellant Manuel Ocampo was charged with the murder of Juan Corrales. Prior to trial, Ocampo filed a motion to suppress evidence that the victim’s wife, Maria Campana, had tentatively identified him as the perpetrator. Ocampo argued that Campana’s identification was unreliable because police had engaged in suggestive conduct when showing her a photographic lineup. The court denied the motion.
At trial, Campana testified that she was fifty percent certain that Ocampo was the man she saw on the night of her husband’s death. In addition, Manuel Arzate, who was initially charged as a codefendant, testified that he saw Ocampo shoot the victim. The jury found Ocampo guilty. The court sentenced Ocampo to 50 years to life in prison and imposed several penalties and fees, including a $20 DNA assessment under Government Code section 76104.7.
On appeal, Ocampo argues that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence related to Campana’s identification; and (2) assessed a $20 DNA fee. We modify the judgment to strike the $20 DNA fee and affirm the conviction in all other respects.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale