Pandya v. Gillette
Appellant Ward Gillette challenges a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Amit Pandya, in an action for fraud against Gillette, Albert Braun, and their company, Five Star Technologies, Inc. (Five Star). Gillette contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's findings that (1) plaintiff justifiably relied on the defendants' misrepresentation and (2) their misrepresentation caused the harm plaintiff suffered. Gillette further challenges the amount of compensatory and punitive damages awarded to plaintiff. We agree with his last point regarding punitive damages and will accordingly modify the judgment.
Comments on Pandya v. Gillette