In re Malik S.
After a series of probation violations during home detention, the juvenile court continued Malik S. (appellant) as a ward of the court, removed him from his mother’s home, and detained him in juvenile hall pending delivery to an appropriate placement. Appellant’s counsel has raised no issue on appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has not filed a supplementary brief. We find no arguable issues and affirm.
Comments on In re Malik S.