legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Fonseca
Defendant Xavier Fonseca appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction for lewd acts upon a child (Pen. Code,[1] § 288, subd. (c)(1)), unlawful sexual intercourse (§ 261.5, subds. (c), (d)), and oral copulation of a person under age 18 (§ 288a, subd. (b)(1)). He contends that the court erred in imposing a $40 criminal assessment for each conviction instead of a $30 fee for each. Further, he contends that the trial court miscalculated both his presentence custody and conduct credits. Finally, he asserts that the matter should be remanded to the trial court to prepare an amended abstract of judgment itemizing the statutory bases for the penalty assessments imposed. The Attorney General concedes each of these points, and we agree. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale