In re C.V.
After a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court found the allegations of a juvenile wardship petition alleging that appellant had possessed a controlled substance, i.e., cocaine base, for sale to be true. Later, another such court determined appellant to be a ward of the court and ordered the probation office to find a suitable facility for him. Appellant appeals, claiming that the first juvenile court erred in not admitting into evidence the testimony of two witnesses who would have proffered testimony questioning the veracity of two of the officers involved in his arrest. We find no abuse of discretion by the juvenile court and hence affirm its orders.
Comments on In re C.V.