In re M.M.
Appellant Sophia C. (mother) appeals a juvenile court order terminating jurisdiction over her daughter, M.M., and awarding custody to T.M. (father). Mother contends the juvenile court erred in terminating jurisdiction without affording her an opportunity to engage in reunification services. Mother argues the court erroneously ruled under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 361.5(b)(10)[2] because subdivision (b)(10) only applies when the juvenile court previously ordered termination of reunification services for a sibling of the child. We affirm.
Comments on In re M.M.