legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.M.
Appellant Sophia C. (mother) appeals a juvenile court order terminating jurisdiction over her daughter, M.M., and awarding custody to T.M. (father). Mother contends the juvenile court erred in terminating jurisdiction without affording her an opportunity to engage in reunification services. Mother argues the court erroneously ruled under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 361.5(b)(10)[2] because subdivision (b)(10) only applies when the juvenile court previously ordered termination of reunification services for a sibling of the child. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale