J.R. v. Super. Ct.
J.R. (mother) petitions this court for extraordinary writ review of a juvenile court order terminating reunification services and setting a selection and implementation hearing for her nine children, who currently range in age from three to 17 years old. She argues that the juvenile court applied an incorrect legal standard when it declined to extend reunification services past the six-month review hearing. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e).)[1] We disagree and deny her petition.
Comments on J.R. v. Super. Ct.