legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gipson

Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187) with personal use of a firearm in the commission of the murder (Pen. Code, § 12022.53).[1] He claims in this appeal that admission of prior inconsistent statements of witnesses without adequate indicia of reliability violated his right to confrontation. We conclude that the admission of the pretrial statements of witnesses who appeared and testified at trial was not error, and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2021 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2021 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale