P. v. Mendez
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, making a criminal threat, possessing a weapon on school grounds and actively participating in a criminal street gang, aka street terrorism. The jury also found to be true enhancement allegations appellant used a knife and acted for the benefit of a gang. We hold there is sufficient evidence to uphold the gang enhancement. However, because appellant acted alone in committing his crimes, his conviction for street terrorism must be reversed. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Mendez