P. v. Obannon
In this appeal, Vincent Obannon (appellant) challenges the denial of his motion to reconsider a Romero ruling,[1] argues the lower court erred in ordering him to pay direct victim restitution to Best Buy in the amount of $2,643.36, and contends, on equal protection grounds, that he is entitled to increased presentence custody credits under the current version of Penal Code section 4019. For reasons that follow, we agree that the restitution order to Best Buy cannot stand. Accordingly, we will strike the order. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Facts and Proceedings Below
We take the facts from the probation officer's report in this case. In turn, those facts were derived from Mountain View Police case number 09-005642 reports.
Comments on P. v. Obannon