Chan v. Rios
Gustavo Hernandez Rios appeals from an injunction issued under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6,[1] which directs him to stay away from Luis Chan. He contends the injunction must be reversed because it was based on hearsay evidence and the testimony of a biased, non-certified interpreter (a friend of Chan’s who was assisting him at the hearing). We affirm, because hearsay evidence is permitted in proceedings under section 527.6 and Rios has failed to demonstrate that the translator’s participation in the hearing was prejudicial.
Comments on Chan v. Rios