In re N.V.
Mario V., found to be the alleged father of minor Nadine V. (minor), appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code,[1] § 366.26.) He first contends that the juvenile court violated his right to due process by failing to designate him a presumed father. He further contends that section 366.26, subdivision (c)(2)(A) precluded termination of his parental rights because “reasonable reunification services†were not provided to him. As we explain, because his claims are either forfeited or lack merit or both, we shall affirm.
Comments on In re N.V.