Airparts Express v. Aircraft Connection
Defendants Aircraft Connection Corp., Gustav Cardenas and Cesar Cardenas appeal from a judgment for breach of contract and conversion entered in favor of Airparts Express Corp. (Airparts.) Their primary contention is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. However, several of defendants’ claimed facts are unsupported by any citation to the record and we consequently disregard them. Further, as Airparts points out, defendants have not provided us with a fair summary of all the evidence bearing upon the findings they claim are unsupported and thus have failed to sustain their burden of demonstrating the evidence is insufficient.
Comments on Airparts Express v. Aircraft Connection