In re A.P.
Father appeals from jurisdictional and dispositional orders and findings in which the juvenile court denied reunification services and ordered paternity testing. The court further ordered that, if DNA testing determined that father was not A.P.’s biological father, the court would vacate all findings and orders as to father. Father contends the juvenile court erred in delaying compliance with Welfare and Institutions Code section 316.2,[1] by not immediately ordering paternity testing, before conducting a contested joint jurisdictional and dispositional hearing. Father also argues that the juvenile court erred in denying his request for a continuance of the hearing. We conclude there was no reversible error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re A.P.