In re T.J.
K.H. (“mother”) appeals from the dependency court’s orders made at a six-month review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (e)[1] denying her request that her son, T.J. (son), a dependent of the court, be returned to her custody. Mother contends substantial evidence does not support the finding that returning son to her custody created a substantial risk of detriment to the child. We conclude substantial evidence supports the finding. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

Comments on In re T.J.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced