In re A.C.
Pamela J. Walls, County Counsel, and Prabhath D. Shettigar, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
D.H. (hereafter mother) and E.O. (hereafter father) purport to appeal from the trial court’s order on a Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 petition terminating their parental rights with respect to their two young children, B.O. and E.O.[1] Specifically, mother and father contend that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the section 388 petitions filed by G.H., the maternal grandfather of B.O. and E.O., in which he sought an order placing the two children with him. G.H. also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his section 388 petitions. In a separate appeal (E055555), mother challenges the trial court’s disposition order denying her reunification services with her oldest child, A.C., who was living with his father pursuant to a family law custody order at the time the section 300 petition was filed in this case. We conclude the claims are all meritless, and therefore we will affirm.
Comments on In re A.C.