In re I.J.
J.J., the father in this juvenile dependency proceeding, seeks reversal of the juvenile court’s jurisdictional orders adjudging his five children dependents of the juvenile court. Father contends that substantial evidence does not support the court’s findings that he sexually abused his 14-year-old daughter I.J., and further contends that I.J.’s three brothers (12-year-old twins and 8-year-old D.J.) and 9-year-old sister were not at substantial risk of being sexually or otherwise abused by their father. We disagree and affirm the orders.
Comments on In re I.J.