Vargha v. Regents of the University of Cal.
Pro per appellant Piruz Vargha sued respondents the Regents of the University of California (the Regents) and four individuals after he was terminated during a probationary period at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). He alleged that respondents retaliated against him for reporting safety concerns. The trial court granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment. Appellant argues that the trial court erred when it granted the motion, as well as when it denied his peremptory challenge of the trial judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6. We affirm.
Comments on Vargha v. Regents of the University of Cal.