Osinoff v. Huter
Former spouses Leslie Osinoff (Husband) and Karen Huter (Wife) appeal the characterization and value of three marital assets. Husband argues that the couple's Thousand Oaks residence and a $100,000 loan to finance its renovation are assets and liabilities of the community. Wife contends that Husband's general contractor business should be valued as of the date of their separation (rather than the date of trial). We agree with each. We modify the judgment accordingly, reverse and remand for further proceedings to value the business, and affirm the judgment in all other respects.
Comments on Osinoff v. Huter