legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Dulce N.
Guadalupe A. appeals an order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 388 petition for modification and terminating her parental rights under section 366.26. She asserts the court did not consider her children's wishes about their permanency plans, as required under section 366.26, subdivision (h), and the evidence is insufficient to support an adoptability finding. Guadalupe also challenges the court's findings the beneficial parent/child relationship and sibling relationship exceptions to termination of parental rights did not apply. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale