In re B.L.
W.L. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying his petitions to change existing orders ("Welf. & Inst. Code" Welf. & Inst. Code,[1] § 388) and terminating his parental rights as to minors Blake L. (Blake) and Paige L. (Paige). ( "§ 366.26" § 366.26.) He contends that: 1) the juvenile court improperly delegated discretion to the minors as to whether visitation would occur; and 2) the court failed to advise him of his constitutional rights during the jurisdictional hearing and thus violated his right to due process.
As we will explain, because father’s arguments are unsupported by the record and his claims are not cognizable on appeal at this stage in the process, we shall affirm the orders of the juvenile court.
Comments on In re B.L.