In re Marco M.
Jasmine D. appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights to her sons, Marco M. and Jesus C. (together the boys). Jasmine contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying her modification petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388)[1] and erred by declining to apply the beneficial relationship and sibling relationship exceptions (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i) & (v)) to termination of parental rights.[2] We affirm.
Comments on In re Marco M.