In re B.G.
B.G. is the subject of these dependency appeals. In one, Dario G., her father (Father), seeks reversal of the trial court order denying his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1] motion for reconsideration of the order terminating reunification services. If that order is overturned, he argues, the section 322.26 order terminating his parental rights also must be reversed. C.C. (Mother) appeals the order terminating her parental rights, arguing that if Father’s appeal is successful, the order terminating her parental rights also must be reversed. We find no abuse of discretion with respect to the trial court’s denial of Father’s section 388 motion. Consequently, we shall affirm the orders from which these appeals have been taken.[2]
Comments on In re B.G.