P. v. Alvarez
In this appeal, Jose Alvarez (appellant) raises issues concerning presentence custody credits and clerical errors related to the abstract of judgment. For reasons that follow, we modify the judgment to include an additional seven days of presentence credits; as so modified we affirm the judgment.
Between 2006 and 2011, appellant was convicted on charges in four different cases.[1] The facts underlying the convictions are not relevant to this appeal. However, we set forth in detail the chronology of events in the four different cases.
Comments on P. v. Alvarez