P. v. Shropshire
Appellant James Wesley Shropshire appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of conspiracy to commit robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 212.5, subd. (a)/182, subd. (a)(1))[1] and vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)), and a court finding that a prior strike conviction allegation was true. (§ 667, subds. (c)-(j); § 1170.12, subds. (a)-(e).) The court imposed a prison term of 13 years, four months consisting of the six-year upper term doubled to 12 years on the conspiracy count and a consecutive 16-month term on the vehicle theft count. On appeal, appellant contends the court violated section 654 by failing to stay sentence on the vehicle theft because the theft, as one of the overt acts charged in the conspiracy to rob offense, was incidental to his single objective to secure money and leave the area. We will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Shropshire