In re J.M.
F.R. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders finding his children, B.R. and J.R., dependent children of the juvenile pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (d)[1] because he sexually abused J.M., and removing B.R. and J.R. from the custody of R.M. (mother). Father contends that there was not substantial evidence to support the juvenile court’s jurisdictional finding that he sexually abused J.M., and to support the order removing B.R. and J.R. from mother’s custody. We affirm.
Comments on In re J.M.