Marriage of Marash and Whitman
Vered Marash appeals from a judgment resolving issues over spousal and child support in proceedings arising from the dissolution of her marriage to respondent Zachary Whitman.[1] Vered contends that the family court abused its discretion by using Zachary's actual rather than imputed income to calculate support, by ordering her to reimburse Zachary for his overpayment of temporary support, by refusing to deviate upward from guideline child support, and by failing to consider fully the parties' relative circumstances in determining permanent spousal support. We find no abuse of discretion in the court's support orders, with the exception of a Dissomaster calculation error both parties recognize. We further agree with Vered's final contention, that the court failed to make findings on Vered's request for pendente lite attorney fees under Family Code section 2030.[2] We will therefore remand this matter for recalculation of child support and for consideration of attorney fees under section 2030.
Comments on Marriage of Marash and Whitman