In re P.W.
Samantha W. (mother) appeals from judgment terminating dependency court jurisdiction over her son, P.W., and vesting sole custody in his father, Edward H. (father), without any provision for visitation. Mother argues the order must be reversed because there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s determination it was in P.W.’s best interests to deny her visitation; there was insufficient evidence of changed circumstances to support father’s petition for an order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388; and because she was not given proper statutory notice of father’s petition. We find none of these contentions persuasive, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re P.W.