P.M. v. Super. Ct.
P.M. (mother) challenges by writ petition a superior court order terminating reunification services and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.26 hearing to select and implement a permanent plan for mother’s seven- and eight-year-old daughters.[1] Mother contends there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding that she received reasonable services. She also argues the court should have granted her additional time to reunify. On review, we will deny mother’s petition, as we conclude the court did not err.
Comments on P.M. v. Super. Ct.