Marriage of Brocklehurst and Masbad
Kimberly Masbad (mother) appeals from an order modifying child support. On appeal, mother claims the trial court violated her right to due process in ordering her to pay child support and erred by failing to consider Ted Brocklehurst’s (father) earning capacity in calculating child support.
Mother has elected to proceed on a clerk’s transcript. ( "Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.121" Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.121.) Thus, the appellate record does not include a reporter’s transcript of the hearing in this matter. This is referred to as a “judgment roll” appeal. ( "Allen v. Toten(1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1079" Allen v. Toten (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1079, 1082-1083; ADDIN BA xc <@cs> xl 57 s WZLWBS000003 xhfl Rep xpl 1 l "Krueger v. Bank of America(1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 204" Krueger v. Bank of America (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 204, 207.) On the face of this record, no error has been established. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Comments on Marriage of Brocklehurst and Masbad

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced