P. v. Cuatlayotl
Defendant and appellant Ana Soto Cuatlayotl appeals after she was convicted of one count of child abuse likely to cause great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a)), with an accompanying allegation that she personally inflicted great bodily injury on a child under age five (Pen. Code, §§ 12022.7, subd. (d), 1192.7, subd. (c)(8)). Defendant’s primary contention is that the trial court should have suppressed any statements she made to police before Miranda[1] warnings had been given. The People respond that the statements defendant sought to have suppressed were not made during a custodial interrogation. We agree, and therefore we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Cuatlayotl