Bernhardt v. Steiner Group
Harold J. Bernhardt (Bernhardt), a resident of New Jersey, [1] appeals from a judgment of dismissal in favor of Steiner Transocean Limited (Steiner), a Bahamian corporation, and Hu Alaric Toy (Toy), an acupuncturist employed by Steiner, subsequent to an order granting a summary judgment motion. Bernhardt contends that he raised triable issues of material fact and, therefore, the trial court erred in granting respondents’ motion. We disagree and will affirm the judgment.
Comments on Bernhardt v. Steiner Group