P. v. Conwright
Defendant, Reginald Conwright, is serving nine years in prison after a jury found him guilty of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459),[1] receiving stolen property (§ 496) and misdemeanor resisting arrest (§ 148, subd. (a)) and the court found true several prior conviction allegations, including that he had been convicted of an attempted burglary that qualified as both a serious felony and a strike. Defendant argues in this appeal that he is entitled to additional presentence custody credits under the version of section 4019 that became effective October 1, 2011. As discussed below, defendant’s contention on this point has no merit. However, we do order the abstract of judgment corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement in two other respects.
Comments on P. v. Conwright