legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.T.
Mother and father (parents) separately appeal from an order terminating their parental rights to their three-year-old son, A.T. (born in 2009) and six-year-old daughter, M.T. (born in 2005). Parents contend the juvenile court erred in rejecting the beneficial relationship exception to adoption under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(I).[1] Father also appeals an order denying his petition under section 388, seeking reinstatement of reunification services. He argues his circumstances have changed and it is in the children’s best interests to grant his petition. We reject parents’ contentions and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale