Williams v. Zerlin
Adjacent property owners dispute the existence of an easement for ingress and egress over appellants' property. Appellants assert that the easement was extinguished by adverse possession. After a bench trial, the court granted declaratory and injunctive relief and quieted title to the easement in favor of respondents and cross-complainants finding that appellants had not established that their use of the easement was hostile. Therefore, appellants did not acquire the easement by adverse possession. Appellants assert the trial court erred because the evidence establishes adverse possession. They also assert various procedural errors.
Comments on Williams v. Zerlin