In re D.D.
The juvenile court adjudged appellant D.D. a ward of the court after it found that he had committed robbery. On appeal, the minor claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel below, because his attorney did not adequately challenge the victim’s identification of the minor, did not offer the testimony of an expert in eyewitness identification, and did not properly impeach the victim with his prior inconsistent statements. We affirm.
Comments on In re D.D.