legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re G.M.
Margaret M. (mother) appeals from orders denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition and terminating her parental rights.[1] Mother contends that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied her section 388 petition because mother did not receive proper notice of the juvenile court proceedings. Mother further argues that reversal of the order denying her section 388 petition requires reversal of the juvenile court’s subsequent order terminating her parental rights. We affirm the orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale