legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cortez
A jury convicted defendant Vidal Lopez Cortez of all six counts with which he was charged: (1) lewd act upon a child under age 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a));[1] (2) forcible lewd act upon a child under age 14 (§ 288, subd. (b)(1)); (3) aggravated sexual assault of a child (§ 269, subd. (a)(3)); (4) attempted oral copulation with a person under age 14 (§ 288a, subd. (c)(1)); (5) sodomy of a person under age 14 (§ 286, subd. (c)(1)); and (6) sodomy by force (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)). After dismissing count 1 as a lesser included offense of count 2, the trial court sentenced defendant to 21 years to life in state prison. The sentence consisted of a 15 years to life term for count 3, a consecutive six year term for count 2, and a concurrent three year term for count 4. The court stayed execution of sentence on counts 5 and 6 pursuant to section 654.
Defendant raises three issues on appeal. First, as to count 2, he claims there was insufficient evidence of “force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the victim” (§ 288, subd. (b)(1)). Second, defendant posits the court improperly sentenced him to a consecutive six-year determinate sentence for conduct (touching the victim’s penis) that occurred at the same time as the conduct resulting in defendant’s indeterminate sentence of 15 years to life in prison (sodomizing the victim). Third, defendant asserts the court should have awarded him 718 custody credits rather than 717 custody credits.[2] We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale