legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pham
Defendant Jimmy D. Pham was charged by information with one count of possession for sale of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5), in addition to gang enhancement allegations (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(A)). Defendant filed a motion for pretrial discovery of evidence of misconduct by the arresting deputies, alleging that his oral and written confessions were coerced by police misconduct. (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess).) The trial court denied the motion, finding that defendant failed to demonstrate good cause for the requested discovery.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale