Marriage of Juergens
In marital dissolution proceedings, Leesa L. Juergens appeals from three judgments and related orders. The first two appeals (Nos. G043884 and G044523) are taken from nonappealable interlocutory judgments and must be dismissed. However, we construe all of the issues Leesa[1] has briefed as being challenges to the third and final judgment of January 13, 2011 and related intermediate rulings (appeal No. G044735), and thus consider each point she raises.
Leesa has addressed a plethora of issues. She says that each of Judge Daniel T. Brice and Judge James L. Waltz made a series of errors. She has failed to meet her burden to show error. We affirm the January 13, 2011 judgment and related intermediate rulings (No. G044735).
Comments on Marriage of Juergens