legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Christopher
A jury convicted Paul Joseph Christopher of assault with intent to commit rape (Pen. Code,[1] § 220, subd. (a)(1)) and three counts of misdemeanor battery (§ 243.4, subd. (e)(1)). The jury found Christopher was armed with and used a deadly weapon during the assault (§ 12022.3, subds. (a) & (b)). Christopher admitted three probation denial prior convictions. (§ 1203, subd. (e).)
The trial court sentenced Christopher to a determinate term of 14 years, consisting of the middle term of four years for the assault plus 10 years for the weapon enhancement under section 12022.3, subdivision (a). The sentence for the armed enhancement charged under section 12022.3, subdivision (b) was stayed pursuant to section 654. Sentences for the misdemeanors were imposed as time served. The court also sentenced Christopher in three other cases in which his probation had been revoked. Those sentences were ordered to run concurrently with the 14-year term in the current case.
Christopher filed a timely notice of appeal.
Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) raising possible, but not arguable issues. We offered Christopher the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal. Christopher asked for and received an extension of time. Christopher filed his brief after the extension of time had expired, however, the court accepted the brief and it is discussed below.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale