P. v. Vigil
Defendant Kelvin Edward Vigil appeals from the sentence imposed by the trial court after he pled no contest to a charge of commercial burglary. He argues that his constitutional equal protection rights require the retroactive application of Penal Code section 4019 (section 4019),[1] as amended in October 2011, to award him additional presentence conduct credits despite the statute’s stated prospective application. He also contends the matter must be remanded for the court to clarify certain fines imposed at sentencing. We vacate the contested fine orders and remand for clarification as to the mandatory fines imposed. In all other respects we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Vigil