legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ferguson
This case is before us on appeal for the second time. In the original appeal, we affirmed the conviction of defendant and appellant Tredis Ferguson, struck a fine from the judgment, and remanded the case to the trial court to hold an in camera hearing under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess).[1] On remand, the trial court granted discovery under Pitchess, held a hearing to determine if there was a reasonable probability of a more favorable result to defendant had the discovery been available at trial, and denied a motion to vacate the conviction.
Defendant contends he was prejudiced by the trial court’s denial of his original motion under Pitchess, which deprived him of the opportunity to impeach Officer Jeffrey Dohlen, the primary prosecution witness. He also argues the trial court applied the wrong standard in assessing prejudice, it is reasonably probable there would have been a different result had Officer Dohlen been impeached, and he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale